: L’agression une histoire naturelle du mal [Jan 01, ] Konrad Lorenz: Couverture dà fraîchie. On Aggression is a book by the ethologist Konrad Lorenz; it was translated into English in As he writes in the prologue, “the subject of this book is. Buy L’agression: Une histoire naturelle du mal by Konrad Lorenz, Dominique Lestel, Vilma Fritsch (ISBN: ) from Amazon’s Book Store.

Author: Tygojora Zujin
Country: Laos
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Relationship
Published (Last): 11 May 2007
Pages: 233
PDF File Size: 20.26 Mb
ePub File Size: 20.17 Mb
ISBN: 773-2-66336-380-8
Downloads: 29705
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Shakalmaran

Not to mention how much beauty has emerged from sublimated aggression. Yet, the book is taken best at a slow pace, because there is a lot of insight in it, and unless you have primed yourself in animal observation well beforehand, it is almost too much to take in. The info on geese – interesting and humorous. One of those rare books which make you look at the world from a whole new angle. There is lots of stuff in this book about the functionality of and speaking about the adaptive value of aggression that makes a lot of sense when it comes to fish, geese and even some mammals.

L’agression: une histoire naturelle du mal – Konrad Lorenz – Google Books

The anthropologist Donald Symonsin The Evolution of Human Sexualityaccused Lorenz of inadequately documenting his major thesis. I’ve know about Lorenz since I was a little boy. Konrad Lorenz, Marjorie Kerr Wilson”. Oct 14, Samuel Viana rated it it was amazing Shelves: Policemen and mercenaries on the pay of a political dictator, lorenx not use violence for defensive purposes, but to terrorize and dominate the citizens of a country.

There is a lot of tediously observed and tested behavioral science in this book, but it hardly ever gets boring. There was a lot of racism here, as well as classism and sexism.

L’agression une histoire naturelle du mal: Konrad Lorenz: : Books

Product details Board book Publisher: Does it requre a humble soul to use it? Just a moment while we sign you in to your Goodreads account.

I feel that much of our society is hell-bent on turning our society into a bunch of gutless, passive wimps. Aug 12, Ivan rated it did not like it. Cover of the first edition. For me, more than anything it has been a thought provoking read. I’ve heard about is ideas on human behaviour some years after that and I reminded curious about the observations he have made agreession them, some like: On Aggression Cover of the first edition. Feb 20, Abubakar Mehdi rated it liked it. He often refers to Kant, citing what biological “mechanisms” must underly his a priori categories as necessary generational developments borne out of evolution.


Lorenz se This book is a gateway into evolutionary biology.

On Aggression

We see it grow up from birth, get old, and pass on, and we know that it is alive, just like us. Mar 22, Anthony rated it it was amazing.

The Selfish Gene 1st ed. ComiXology Thousands of Digital Comics.

Amazon Restaurants Food delivery from local restaurants. However, Lorenz does not state that aggressiveare in any way more powerful, prevalent, or intense than more peaceful behaviors such as mating rituals.

I asked him if male chimp bonds were stronger among the more aggressive males and how male bonds worked in chimp society. It is very difficult to understand this subject by studying only ducks and rats. There are no discussion topics on this book yet. The author’s thought processes often seemed incomplete and were difficult to follow. Bonding is still a fascinating topic! Try to make your own conclusions knowing that and the condemnation of the so-called “millitant manifest”.

If you are a seller for this product, would you like to suggest updates through seller support? Sipes’s “culture-pattern” model, where war and substitute activities will vary directly. He argues against the “drive-discharge” model created by Freud and Lorenz, where substitute aggressive activities such as combative sports should reduce the potential for war, and in support of Richard G. Lorenz talks of humanity by first fooling you in through lots of fascinating stories about animals, many of them hilarious, some heartbreaking.

Working with geese, he investigated the principle of imprinting, the process by which some nidifugous birds i. The book was reviewed many times, both positively and negatively, by biologists, anthropologists, psychoanalysts and others.

Driver concluded that ethology could contribute, alongside neurophysiology and psychologyto resolving the problem of conflict. Each chapter opens up a whole new layer and shines with an enthusiasm for life as it is expressed in all sorts of living things.


Life, after all, is hard to argue. You can read this book as a species of manifesto or a sermon. By using this site, you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.

But to be fair, I hoped for much more paragraphs similar to those from the last 3 chapters – a comparative approach and an analysis of humans or at l A very important piece of writing put together in an overly ambitious fashion. I am eager to read more Lorenz, and having just stumbled upon him on YouTube, learn more about what’s going on in the world of evolutionary biology today through Bret Weinstein. Tinkle, comparing On Aggression with Ardrey’s The Territorial Imperative in BioScience innoted that few books had been reviewed so often “or with as much vehemence in both knorad and derogation” as these two.

Goodreads helps you keep track of books you want to read. Wilson compares aggression to “a preexisting mix of chemicals ready to be transformed by specific catalysts that are added,” rather than “a fluid that continuously builds pressure against the walls of its containers.

There’s a problem loading this menu right now. Therefore, if we understand the instinctual behavior patterns in animals, we can explain a thing or two about human behavior too. Fischer argued that Lorenz’s view of the instinctive nature of human aggression was “basically right”, commenting that “Lorenz would probably cite the fury of his critics as further proof of the correctness of his thesis”.

Fromm realized that Lorenz didn’t see that in the humans and in other species there are ll types of aggression, in addition to the defensive.

The one idea I remember is that male bonding and aggression are linked: